Author: Dan Plettner
Even for those of us who stayed away, it is impossible to ignore the lessons from the troubled Facebook (FB) IPO. “Mr Market” tends to repeat the same lessons on his pupils. Paying attention and not forgetting lessons is important. Whether observing a hot sector or a presumed hot IPO, it is critical to have discipline with any investing process.
Facebook’s offering reminded me of a painful lesson “Mr. Market” taught me back in the 1990s when I participated in the CompuServe IPO with my college savings. Everything involving the Internet was hot at the time and CompuServe had been the leader in Net access. This was even before a company called America On-Line (AOL) emerged to dominate the phone modem era market.
The initial “pop” in CompuServe’s IPO was lackluster, and it later broke its offering price. As an inexperienced young investor, I though the IPO looked attractive. It wasn’t. I lacked humility or any historical perspective as to the lessons which “Mr. Market” had taught other pupils before me. I did all the wrong things. I lost more, and more, and more.
The best hedge fund talent in the Internet sector likely surfed the AOL wave while it was a growth business, and shorted it too when new technologies emerged. They likely shorted CompuServe all the way down. I lacked humility to see CompuServe was a dog with fleas.
Despite the fact that I’m an Investment Advisor with several models on an online site like Covestor, I’m no expert in social networking.
I think Facebook’s service is a fantastic way to keep friends and family alert to (big) news at our home. We don’t see enough of our family and friends in person. I very rarely pay any attention to e-mails I get from LinkedIn (LNKD), because I don’t strive to be any kind of social networking businessman.
Suffice it to say, investing in Facebook would have been worse than just investing outside of my focus on under-followed securities. While I’ve long suspected that Facebook faces challenges on the revenue front, I’m not the expert on it. I’d be a fool to compete with the hedge fund talent in knowing when it’s a buy or sell post IPO. For me, the only temptation to avoid was whether to try the flip game.
I’ll be sticking to my own discipline. There have been recent developments with several Closed End Funds including tenders announced by Alpine Global Premier Properties (AWP) ,New Ireland Fund (IRL), and several of the Morgan Stanley Funds including (RNE).
If I were a betting man, I’d likely be doubling down on my holdings in my MLP Direct Ownership model, not buying a large IPO like Facebook that shocked everybody by breaking its initial offering price. I’m not tweaking much of anything right now though.
My holding intentions within that sector tend to be extremely long term in nature, but I do believe the MLP sector is at an attractive entry point and I see the direct holdings as far superior to any ETF, Mutual Fund, or Closed End Fund Exposure in the MLP sector.
I do not have a crystal ball. I aim to remain fully objective, humble, and balanced in the opportunities I observe within my discipline in every style. I must be resolved in making decisions based on objective analysis rather than emotions.
For more than 14 years I've focused my investing and research efforts on Closed-End Mutual Funds, called CEFs. They represent an alternative way to invest in stocks and bonds. CEFs frequently trade at a discount relative to the price of fund’s underlying portfolio, which I personally see as a way to own stocks and bonds at a discount to their underlying value.
I previously worked as a closed-end fund product specialist at Morgan Stanley. More recently, I provided independent closed-end fund research to institutional investors. I have written more than 50 articles regarding closed-end funds and am frequently quoted in the media.
My goal is to invest in funds that I believe offer a favorable mix of risk versus potential reward. I attempt to earn a profit when the gap between the market price and the net asset value of a fund narrows.